Friday, April 29, 2011
Ela: 49 Writers Weekly Round-up
Thursday, April 28, 2011
Andromeda/Your Turn: The purpose and joys of rereading
Several times recently I've come across this quote: "Curiously enough, one cannot read a book: one can only reread it. A good reader, a major reader, an active and creative reader is a rereader." Vladimir Nabokov, Strong Opinions.
The quote, and an entire essay by Zadie Smith on reading Nabokov (especially Pnin) and Roland Barthes is here, from Smith's essay collection, Changing My Mind.
I posted the rereading question on Facebook yesterday and received some wonderful replies. The answers reminded me that my own primary reason for rereading -- to learn how great stories are structured, to teach myself how to write -- is not the main reason for many. Some people want to reconnect with their own earlier self, to remember who they were or to test whether a book that touched them long ago will touch them still.
As a writer, I am inspired by the notion, as discussed by Zadie Smith, of getting to know a half-dozen books really well over one's reading lifetime. I'm not sure what those six very special books would be for me (Virginia Woolf's Mrs. Dalloway and Nabokov's Lolita might be a start).
When I first read a book (or watch a film for that matter), I'm either distracted by delight, or I find myelf willing the book or film to go in directions I want it to go. On a reread, I can simply pay better attention to what is, and perhaps why the author made the choices he or she did. Not because they are my top choices of all time, but only because I have a hankering and am curious to peek behind the authorial curtains and see if I can notice more this time around about structure and voice, I'm thinking of rereading Orwell's 1984 , Ford Madox Ford's The Good Soldier, and Ian McEwan's Atonement, plus perhaps a few of the suggestions below, starting with Proulx's Shipping News...
From Facebook:
Jan Flora The Shipping News (Proulx) and Animal Dreams (Kingsolver). I catch more of the symbolism with every re-reading.
Erin Anais Hanson I've re-read love in the time of cholera 6 or 7 times now. First read it when I was 16 and every time I re-read it I find some new way to relate to it. I try to re-read books that I claim as "favorites" every couple of years. It's a great way to see how I've changed as a reader and how the material holds up.
Rich Capitan somehow it has become almost cliche', but Lord of the Rings. During my previous life doing field work, the books always came with me into the field.
Michael Tuchman Women in Love gets a re-reading every two years. Sadly, another book that has always been a powerful influence on me (Demian by Hesse) has proven somewhat shallower on re-reading :-( I re-read the Women in Love because I find the broad scope of social conflict fascinating as well as the study in the violence inherent in male-female coupling. This is still a difficult topic to broach.
Rich Capitan Sorry I didn't list the "why" of my choice: the depth of detail and complexity of the writing and mythos. Also, the story is near and dear to me since its been part of my life since the age of six or something. A very important slice of who I am and a huge amount of comfort and connecting with my childhood.
Rosemary Austin I don't reread that many, but To Kill a Mockingbird is a timeless reminder of how we treat our fellow humans. I've also reread The Shipping News. Love the prose.
Gita Shipkowitz Andromeda-I have enjoyed rereading Ramona the Pest, the Henry Huggins books, and all the rest by B. Cleary! I enjoyed them, and now my kids are!
Sharon Lax The God of Small Things...
James O'Brien Animal Farm and The Catcher in the Rye.
Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Andromeda: When to burn or bury, when to revise again, with a nod to Jeffrey Eugenides
Inbetween my first novel and forthcoming "second" novel were several manuscripts that have never made it into print, including one complete novel I tried to revise several times before making peace with its fate as a not-meant-to-be-published work. I don't believe in wasting more time or creative energy just to make up for past losses. Everything we write teaches us essential lessons and those are lessons we keep, regardless of what happens with all our messy pages. So I was relieved to finally set that novel aside for good more than two years ago and turn to something fresh and more joyful to write, a slimmer and simpler novel aligned with my own interests and obsessions. (That project, which I started with no assumptions that it would be publishable, became THE DISCUS THROWER, forthcoming in 2012 from Soho Press; it bears noting that the projects I've imagined were less marketable were the ones purchased and the ones I thought were sure bets have languished.)
Still, the old "inbetween" novel continues to revisit my subsconscious, like an old friend or lover who shows up via email, inviting second thoughts and backward glances. Past projects, like past loves, invite one to entertain dangerous thoughts: Would it be better this time around? Have I learned enough to make it work? Have circumstances changed or am I just deluding myself?
In the case of this particular manuscript, I am absolutely certain now what my earliest mistakes were. A few readers and even an agent pointed to issues of plot or subject matter, those obvious culprits, and in one case the questioning of my plot put me on the defensive. (A question was raised about having my main character be homosexual -- although that word never appears in this historical novel -- noting that fiction with gay characters is a hard sell; that offended me enough that it fogged my vision about what the project's true weaknesses were. Another question was raised that my subject matter was too intellectual. Yet another red herring.)
After four years of reading and study, I am astonished to realize that I didn't see the true problem from the beginning: not a problem of plot (or sexual politics), but POV. I chose the wrong character as narrator. And I chose the wrong distance, staying removed from the events and outside of all the characters' heads. (What seems intellectual or bloodless may seem that way only because we don't have access to character emotions to balance information being presented). I know also why I did this: because I was reading, for several years, books written in a time period when that kind of more removed omniscience and objectivity were common. My role models included one famous Edwardian author whose minor books have been nearly forgotten, yet I was using those same minor novels, trying to channel a voice that appealed to me and, I thought at the time, matched my subject matter, setting, and time period perfectly. The result felt right to me, but not right to the few modern readers who had an opportunity to pass judgment.
The more I write even this simple blogpost, the more revved-up I get, thinking "Of course -- the time is right. I can make a go of it now. Dig out that old manuscript!" But I'm still wary, because awareness and new knowledge are not the only issues. Energy is. And I'm not sure one can summon the same kind of fresh energy to rework something that has already been reworked. I convinced myself long ago that I'd already spoiled the broth with too much stirring, boiling, and overseasoning.
This week, by chance, I read about two authors who did benefit from deep, long-term, multiple revisions of the kind I'm discussing. One was Henry James. Since I've already gotten myself into a bit of trouble by emulating long-dead authors, I'll leave out the James anecdotes for now (including his multiple revisions focused on POV issues) and mention instead someone still alive and beloved and about to re-enter the literary spotlight: Jeffrey Eugenides. The Pulitzer Prize-winning author of Middlesex, a favorite of mine, was also a keynote speaker at the Kachemak Bay Writers' Conference about five years ago. He has a new much-awaited novel, The Marriage Plot, due out later this year.
Eugenides refuses to rush his work. He told the Kachemak Bay crowd that his agent had to practically tear Middlesex from his hands. Eager readers have waited eight years for The Marriage Plot. And even when his own publisher interviewed him about the forthcoming novel, Eugenides insisted on staying mostly mum about it. But he did share this:
"Awhile ago, I was writing a book about a family throwing a debutante party. As I followed one of the characters, her story began to swell until I finally realized that I had two different books on my hands. I then had to surgically separate the two books, like conjoined twins, hoping that each retained sufficient major organs to survive. I’ve put the first book in a drawer for the time being, working on the second."
Note the willingness to set aside one of those twins -- for the time being.
And also a willingness to keep trying on a plot or theme that hasn't quite clicked. In the same interview, Eugenides says that parts of this new novel take place in India, inspired by his own college travels. He tried multiple times over the years to write about a young character volunteering for Mother Teresa.
I tried in my twenties and then I tried again in my thirties. But I never published anything on the subject except for a small nonfiction piece. Well, in the new book, I’m trying yet again, and we’ll get to see if I’m getting any better at it.
Willing to revisit and recycle, Eugenides seems equally comfortable with letting go. He mentions a significant subplot in Middlesex that never made the final cut, as well as an entire second early version of the novel seen by his publisher, which Eugenides chose to jettison.
So which should it be: keep trying again? Reconcile and redraft? Give up and never look back? I'm not sure yet, but perhaps in another year, I'll let you know. If any of you have similar success (or regrets) trying to radically revise a long work, share those thoughts here.
Tuesday, April 26, 2011
Leslie Hsu Oh interviews Howard Blum: The Floor of Heaven
In June, best-selling author and two-time Pulitzer nominee, Howard Blum will keynote the second annual writer’s conference in Skagway, North Words Writers Symposium. Scheduled to be released today, his newest book, The Floor of Heaven: A True Tale of the Last Frontier and the Yukon Gold Rush
As a nonfiction writer, I appreciated your “Note on Sources,” especially the chapter by chapter sources of information. You discussed how before mapping the narrative architecture of this book, you extensively read “piles and piles of books, articles, pamphlets, and monographs,” and travelled to Texas, the Alaska Panhandle, and Yukon Territory. How long did it take you to write The Floor of Heaven?
As a reporter at the New York Times specializing in investigations, I learned that you could research a story forever. You could spend your days hunting for just one more fact, just one more quote. Running around with a notebook in hand is sure a lot easier than actual sitting down to write. (Heck, just about anything is). But since newspapers have deadlines (and often demanding and vitriolic editors to boot), I had to teach myself when to throw in the towel, when to sit down to write the damn thing. It's the same sort of process and dilemma with a non-fiction book. You can never do enough research - but if you research forever you'll never get the thing done. Paul Valery wrote that "a work of art is never finished, just abandoned." Now, I ain't claiming that The Floor of Heaven is a work of art, but there came a time when I just had to stop looking for one more new fact, one more new detail. The book business is a business; when you take an advance, you sign a contract. I'd agreed to deliver my book in three years. It took me a little longer than that. I didn't interview all the people, all the descendants I might've. I didn't read all the books I could've, or visited all the places I'd planned on. But I got it done, and accurately I'd like to think. And I wrote The Floor of Heaven in not too much longer than the specified three years.
In Phillip Lopate’s essay “On the Ethics of Writing About Others,” recently published in Creative Nonfiction, he examines several approaches to writing about others. He says, “Some writers get around the problem by showing their manuscripts to the people being written about and asking if they object to anything.” Did you have any descendants of Siringo, Smith, Carmack or any Alaskan for that matter, including Alaska Native communities, review drafts of the book? How was it received? What is your approach to writing about others?
I'm always wary of giving the people I write about a sneak preview of what's coming. It's like when I look in the mirror: I'm never really satisfied with what I see - but I know it's the truth. And when I write I hold a mirror up to people and I really don't care to worry about whether they think it's flattering. All I care about is that it's true. Here's the problem: Someone can be 5'2" and you can describe them as "short" and the next thing you know they're offended and demanding a retraction. I try to write what I see. I try to report accurately. Yeah, I make my share of mistakes. And I publish corrections if necessary. But showing someone what's coming before it's in print is like reaching into a hornet's nest. You're bound to get stung. I never do it, and never will.
With recent investigations accusing Greg Mortenson of grossly exaggerating and fabricating parts of Three Cups of Tea, the spotlight is once again on the ethics of nonfiction writers. In The Floor of Heaven’s “Note on Sources,” you state that “no source — not even a first-person account, or contemporaneous newspaper articles, or, for that matter, an article in a scholarly journal — could be accepted at face value…I would need to make judgments about which versions of the past made the most sense to me, which seemed the most reliable.” What advice do you have for nonfiction writers in making the right choice? How did you fill “holes” in your story?
With so many versions of the truth, how do you know what really happened a century or so ago? The honest answer is - you can't. And if you're setting out to write a book like The Floor of Heaven that aspires to be an accurate history as well as a page-turning and suspenseful mystery - well, you're just gonna need to make some choices. I didn't want the book to drone on like a scholar's tome, with caveats that interrupted the narrative by exclaiming that while some scholars say this, others say that. I had to make what I thought were reasonable choices. I had to trust my own judgments, and by reading the book the reader is showing his faith in me and my informed subjectivity. But it's a difficult literary tightrope to walk, and to keep my balance I stuck to some rules. Let me share them. One: When dialogue appears in quotes, these are words that can be directly attributed to an actor in this story. They are taken from either the principal's own writings - books, letters, diaries - or a contemporaneous newspaper or literary account. Two: When I describe what someone in this story is thinking or feeling, these are thoughts and emotions that were first reported by the individual. And three: When a location or incident is described, the details are well grounded in my research. As for filing "holes" in my story, I never tried to plug 'em. I just used what I could substantiate - and left out the rest. The "holes," as you call them are there. I can only hope they're not too gaping.
You captured the draw of Alaska for Siringo, Smith, and Carmack as “running away from something in their own lives,” “making a fresh start,” and looking for adventure. “They were heroes who had outlived their usefulness. Their spirits found neither joy or comfort in the routine; and —a curse? a blessing?— they had grown accustomed to the sharp edge of uncertainty that shaped an active, dangerous, self-sufficient life. They wanted to grow old boldly, and in the company of new adventures.” Do you think it’s important that a place like this exists even today?
People are still looking for adventure, for excitement. That's human nature (thank God). Some people will find it covering a war in Libya, or waking up each morning in a still rough-and-tumble place like Alaska. Or, as I do, sitting down each new day and taking on the challenge of filling a blank page. I admire people who take large risks, and The Floor of Heaven is, in its way, a tribute to these sorts of adventurers, to these tenacious men and women. It's a story about the indomitable spirit that built this country. About men and women who didn't want to settle, but instead took large risks. And this is a spirit and a mindset that is still around, still going strong. Long may it prosper!
Describe your typical day as a full-time writer. Before you became a full-time writer, what writing processes worked for you?
A typical day is pretty boring stuff: I get up, make coffee, and then I go to work. Some days I'm done at noon, other days it'll stretch on till 4. But usually by 4:30 I'm off for a jog. I don't listen to music when I run. I think about what I've written that day and how I can make it better. When I come back, first thing I do is make notes about what I thought about during my 3 miles or so through the Connecticut countryside. Then I put it aside. My work day is done. Only to start again in the morning as soon as the coffee is brewed. Oh, when I got out of college, I worked first at The Village Voice and then at the New York Times. Those were jobs with offices and desks and starting times. But for the past two decades or so I've been my own boss. Each day waking up, making the coffee, and then sitting down to work.
In a PopMatters interview, you said you want to be remembered as a father to Tony, Anna, and Dani. How do you balance your role as a father with your writing career?
Retractably, I don't think I've pulled off the balancing act too well. This is my tenth book, and, well, they do take time. I think my three kids would be the first to point fingers telling me I've put my work first. And I think my ex-wife would too. John Gardner wrote words to the effect that if a writer is lucky, he'll never love too much. Well, I've had my loves. I've enjoyed my distractions. But I also have typed a lot of words. I think my kids probably think too many. But they've now all teenagers, one in college, one heading off in the fall, and one still struggling through high school geometry. I'm immensely proud of them and the people they've grown-up to be - in spite of my distracted parenting.
Have mentors played a role in your career? Who were those mentors and how did they help you?
I've had my share of mentors. The one, though, who had the biggest influence on my work and on my life was Dan Wolf, one of the founders of The Village Voice. By editing my personality, by trying to cull out everything that was indulgent or superficial or just plain dumb in the way I went about my days, he edited my prose. It was an uphill battle, but if I got anywhere at all, it's thanks to Dan. These days I work with Rick Horgan at Crown. I don't know if someone younger than you can be technically a mentor. But I trust Rick's judgment totally. He never fails to improve whatever I write.
Monday, April 25, 2011
My Alaska Home: A Guest Post by Ken Waldman
So, where am I really from?
Take your choice, I might as well say. When I began this work in Juneau back in late 1994, every job was an airplane or boat ride away. Moving to Anchorage in 1998 allowed me to work more on the road system, and made it easier to get to my rural Alaska jobs. But starting in 2000, once the first book and CD came out, I was increasingly working down South. Having to tack on the cost of a plane ticket and rental car for those jobs quickly proved unsustainable. But if I were to continue on this path, which felt warranted, I'd have to adapt. The following year I drove out of Anchorage to tour more extensively and efficiently. I'd give it a couple of years, I told myself. Either I'd get more established, or I'd fail.
Even today, I tell myself if I'd been less clumsy in getting my business off the ground at the very beginning, I'd still be living full-time in Alaska. Maybe I'd have found more jobs in and around Anchorage; maybe I'd have segued into a full-time job somewhere in the state. But then as I think about it some more, I shake my head. More likely, I'd have only been postponing the inevitable. Despite the support of some friends and organizations in the state, for the most part I've consistently found a much friendlier reception elsewhere.
For a decade now, as I've criss-crossed the continent, though I've been fortunate to meet all sorts of amazing people in all sorts of amazing communities, and though I've spent extended times in Louisiana and New York, I haven't been able to imagine myself as anything but an Alaska resident. So what does it mean to be an Alaskan--and an Alaskan writer--roaming around the country?
For the past two and a half years, it means I get asked about Sarah Palin. For a much longer time, it means I've been in position to correct common misconceptions about Alaska. It means that when do I return to the state, I don't take it for granted. Last summer I finally performed at the state fair, and then for the first time got to visit McCarthy, where I worked for a weekend. I may not be around much, but I thoroughly appreciate that I have friends, and friends of friends, all over.
It means when I see fellow Alaskans in my travels, I feel there's a group where I immediately belong. It means that though I've long been estranged from my biological family, there's truth to my long-running joke that I've replaced my biological family with Alaska. Maybe that's why, in lieu of family, I make it back at least once or twice a year,where each trip I remember why I've loved being here full-time for so long, and also get to directly experience so many of the frustrations that can make this such a difficult place for me.
I began this poetry month series of posts by sharing how I started writing poems in Alaska. These days, I'm barely writing poems, save for acrostic poems for the schools I visit. Earlier this month, I did write the one in memory of John Haines (and if I didn't have the spur here at 49 Writers, I don't think I'd have written it). Now, I'm scribbling notes for this post aboard a plane from Juneau, en route to Seattle, then Los Angeles, where I'll be working for several days (and typing this two days later in a hotel room in Whittier CA).
This past week, it was terrific seeing long-time friends and meeting new ones at the Folk Festival in Juneau. On stage, for my short set I had a pair of Fairbanks friends accompany me. We played a couple of medleys, and I shared two poems. The first one I'd written two months ago in memory of Warren Argo, who I first met in 1984, a Washington musician and festival producer, who for more than thirty years had been deeply involved in traditional music throughout the Northwest. The past fifteen years he'd been head sound technician at the festival in Juneau. The second poem, written close to twenty years ago, fit with a particular fiddle tune about a cat, and was another take on mortality.
How We Scatter
in memory of Warren Argo
A life may begin in Fresno,
Seattle, maybe Philadelphia,
swing you to Spokane, Juneau,
perhaps Port Townsend. We attend
schools, graduate, take jobs,
quit them, move again. We get
married. Or don't. We have
children. Or not. We make
friends--friends, the existential
as we hug hello, exchange smiles
or tears, waltz ourselves across
continent, feet barely touching floor.
How we scatter as the years
have their way. What's the sound
of an intent engineer steady
on board? A festival of musicians
lost in fiddle tunes, clawhammer
banjos making noise? A proud dad
phoning his girl? What's the sound
of collective joy? How we scatter,
settling from Olympia to Opelousas,
Oakland to Santa Fe to Manhattan,
finding community ever more fully
in this world. And then the next.
Purple
Pretend you're a cat
on your eighth life:
the sky, the clouds,
the trees--the world's
a bruise as you leap
clawing ledge to ledge.
One fabulous death left
to fritter, your purr
knows gravel, your meow
the memory of strawberry.
For the first time
you find yourself musing
about muskrat, rabbit,
the meaning of mouse.
Lucid, vulnerable, shy,
you edge to your ninth.
from The Secret Visitor's Guide
Wings Press
San Antonio, TX 2006
(first published in Yankee)
Final words?
I'm of Alaska, and not. Doing what I do, I have a reasonable perspective what Deb, Andromeda, and everyone else helping at 49 Writers are involved in, and it's no small thing. The writing programs at UAA and UAF fill certain needs, as do the conferences in Valdez and Homer, and the new one in Skagway. The work that Carolyn Servid has been doing for years in Sitka fills another need. It's all good. A start-up like this is a monumental undertaking.
I read this blog daily and am grateful to have a writerly way to stay connected to Alaska, despite my time away, and the distance. Thanks for giving me the opportunity to share a few posts of my own.
Saturday, April 23, 2011
Say It Ain’t So, Joe: A Guest Post by Cindy Hardy
This past fall, Joe married his long-time girlfriend, Karen Grossweiner, who writes there will be a funeral mass for Joe in Cincinnati on May 2 and a Celebration of Life on May 22. She plans a memorial gathering in Fairbanks in July, when she returns to Alaska.
Joe trained as a physicist, but always wrote poetry and, when I met him in the fall of 1978, he was one of the brilliant young men in a writers’ workshop at UAF taught by John Morgan and Dave Stark that included Dan O’Neill, Linda Schandelmeier, Jean Anderson, Patricia Monaghan, Gerald Cable, and Elyse Guttenberg, among others. Joe’s poems always contained language that flew off the page to somewhere unexpected. He was tall and wiry with an unruly tangle of blonde hair and an elusive quality—he would leave town for his brother’s farm in Kentucky nearly every year, so that he seemed to have the Cheshire habit of continually appearing and disappearing from our literary community.
After a number of years working first at the UAF Geophysical Institute, then at DOT, he made a life for himself in the cabin he built among birch trees on Old Cat Trail outside Fairbanks. He had electricity, but no running water, and he heated with wood. One of the ways he meditated on the nature of this world and generated poems was to head out to his woods with a Swede saw and cut small trees—thinning out his patch of forest—which he stacked in a mosaic pattern under his porch. He also stacked rocks, and had a years’-long project building a fieldstone wall through his brother’s Kentucky property.
Joe believed writers should write, no more, no less. Because he had his land and could support himself with carpentry work in the summer, most of his winter days were spent just writing—or running, or reading, or cutting wood, or engaging in long conversations that drifted along as if there were no other demands on either person’s time. Talking to Joe could make you feel that work was an indulgence, a distraction. The true work was the written word.
Joe and I had a years’-long habit of getting together for Poetry Thursdays. It started when he needed help navigating a computer version of one of his books—what to do about margins, fonts, etc. It evolved into evenings of his reading aloud new drafts of his developing memoir, or my reading him new poems or essays. He took the manuscript of my book and chapbook and gave me useful suggestions on poem order, sections, and the paring away of words. He always had time for other writers and, perhaps, more faith in their work than they had themselves.
Every Christmas, our family would go to Joe’s place to thin out a spruce from “Joe’s Tree Farm.” We would stop for tea first, then after a few hours of conversation, head out in a rush to find a tree before the waning light left us.
Now, he has left us. “So many,” Eliot says, “I had not thought death had undone so many.” Eliot’s words still live—and so will Joe’s. And Joe was right: writing (or art or whatever we can create out of our own uniqueness) is the true work. The rest is distraction.
Our thanks to Cindy Hardy for this post, portions of which originally appeared at her blog http://www.mattiespillow.wordpress.com/.
Friday, April 22, 2011
Ela: 49 Writers Weekly Round-up
Thursday, April 21, 2011
Andromeda: Tutka Bay, Dani Shapiro, and watching spring arrive
A treat this morning: I gave myself some online blog-reading time to get to know Dani Shapiro, the memoirist and novelist who is leading our Sept 2-5 Tutka Bay writers' retreat. A friend from Denver, Judith, introduced me to this blog (and to Dani's writings in general) some time ago, but I hadn't read Dani's blogposts lately, including musings about "On Writing for the Right Reasons," writing as "Noble Failure", and "On Being Self-Protective", which includes this wonderful quote:The only hope I have of writing something good is to protect my inner life, to coddle it, to treat it like the sensitive instrument it is. A violinist cares for her violin. A singer babies her voice. A sculptor finds just the right quarry. As writers, the difference is that our own selves--our internal landscapes--are our instrument. And so we must protect ourselves from that which throws us off course.
That passage spoke to me because of some health problems I've been dealing with, especially for the last three months. About two weeks ago, coping with some chronic low-grade pain issues as well as the stress of multiple and increasingly unsatisfactory medical appointments, I made myself a promise: that I'd get outside for a walk or a run every single day in April. I expected the exercise to help get my blood pumping (without which the pain relief meds never kick in adequately), but what struck me after about day three was that just being outside to witness the coming of spring helped most of all.
I came to Alaska as a fairly dedicated outdoorswoman, and in recent years have spent more and more time inside, in front of a screen, or in my car on endless chauffering rounds, racing between errands. This April, I told myself, I would actually see the snow melt, watch the creeks rise, see the grass turn green, smell the opening buds. And for the last two weeks, I have. There is much more I need to do in order to "protect my inner life," but it's a start.
Those thoughts led me back to looking at picures of Tutka Bay from our retreat last year, and remembering what a beautiful and nurturing world that was --and is. If you're thinking of joining the fall retreat, you should know that we have early-bird member rates ($100 off) before May 1. All the details here. A limited number of spots (five at last count) remain. Whatever your spring and summer plans are, I hope you find some places of beauty and quiet, as well as opportunities for reading and writing, learning and sharing.
Wednesday, April 20, 2011
Andromeda: Three Write-a-thon Writings
Enjoy their writings and please help us out by voting for one PEOPLE'S CHOICE, just for fun. Casual rules: one vote per person, writers are allowed to vote for themselves (as a scholar once asked: if we are not for ourselves, who will be?), winner gets a $20 Title Wave Books gift certificate.
NANCY DESCHU, TICK FEVER
Yellow flowers drift from the canopy
onto the dark soil path.
Traces of tapir, capybara, panther,
raucous calls of scarlet parrots,
bird songs and butterflies
float on humidity.
Ticks fall from dark trees,
small as silver pinheads
whirl down,
hunting for warm-blood.
101 degrees, we sweat,
Our necks drip wet.
We sit on a log, swab our faces,
I tuck my hair up in a cap.
A monkey above us looks down,
and pees, streaming onto our lunch.
We pick ticks from each other,
then lift our backpacks and begin again,
Walking through a tunnel of color and song.
Day by day tick bacteria
slip into my system,
settling
in blood, heart, liver, nerves,
skewers into my brain.
My body boils with fever,
then shivers with chills.
But I do not die and feed the forest floor.
I live to tell about the flow of the forest –
prey predators, predators prey,
The petals on the path,
the panther print on the trail.
CINDY BELL, EXCERPT FROM AN ESSAY IN PROGRESS
Far too many days, I feel like Edgar Allan Poe’s character, Fortunato, in The Cask of Amontillado; I feel as though I could scrape my fingers, tattered and bleeding, down the brickwork and maze of morter joints in an useless effort to free myself. No one can hear my scream, silent as it is, caught in the thickness of my prison, grey matter and bone, muscle and skin. The difference, of course, is, no one “put” me here, behind this barrier to life, coarse and unforgiving, no one, unless that is, you believe in God. It’s in these times that I cry out, as Fortunato did, “For the love of God!” Nothing answers but the thump-thumping of my heartbeat which I myself can almost count in these moments of darkness.
These moments of darkness, known to the uninitiated as major depression, have gripped my life as long back as I can remember. While some people’s depressions are known to bring with them a palpable pain in their bodies, something that can’t be identified but which radiates and throbs the same as any life-altering injury, mine has always brought with it a painlessness, a high tolerance. When I was only 6, I sat across the road to our trailer on my little red bike, fresh out of training wheels. I watched a boy pumping the pedals of his bike downhill toward me. I miscalculated and sped across the road. He ran over me. I casually walked home with a broken collarbone...
SANDY KLEVEN, THREE POEMS
Strumming Done
The red estate of my mind found purchase
in a clicking house of seventeen balconies, the sea.
Ordinary fields took root, the brook ran cold.
Festivities continued for hours – unmatched and fro.
No one was clumsy and a difference could be held in mirrors.
The highest notes were welcomed to the song.
As before, I was grateful for small favors, the kicking horse,
the trailing star, the half-wish matching of wit with chance.
No regret ever shook so many.
No design ever said so much to so few.
Home School
Large men begin to live within
my own small house on the south
side of my mouth where everything
was left to smolder. Last summer
it was done, a finished balustrade
strewn with men who strum.
Leave your guitar at home next time.
It is your voice I require.
Near Distance
You must get beyond this particular moment.
You have been stranded here, long enough.
Welcome the next with its bindle of paint,
gloves with no fingers, a comb.
Press your heart to the plow, wholeheartedly.
The one word is not strum. Neither
is it sinew or straw. When asked who will go
to the woodshed, shout your own fearful name.
Good job writers! And readers, please do us the favor of voting at right. We know they're all worthy, but we have a certificate to give away.
Tuesday, April 19, 2011
JOYFUL NOISES AND SILENCES AT THE 10TH ANNUAL KACHEMAK BAY WRITERS’ CONFERENCE: A Guest Post by Eva Saulitis
But so much more, as always, so that we who teach and attend this yearly immersion in love for language leave the conference thrumming, jangling, energized. In my case, I can’t wait to head to my writing room to press pen to page. In that silence that comes after, having absorbed language until I’m saturated, I sit – the taste and feel and sound of words in my mouth and ears, along my skin, drunk with ideas and new friends, a new stack of books piled up on my desk, a poem begun in a workshop needling away, an essay knocking at my brain – and what I learned, what I heard, pushes that pen along its way.
Some of us presenters are asked to monitor panels and workshops and classes and it’s agonizing to decide on just one during each session. Of the four concurrent, there are always at least two workshops I can’t live without. From this year’s line-up, how do I decide, for just one instance, between a session about the “hermit crab” essay taught by the very person who coined the term, Brenda Miller, and a workshop about “ekphrastic” poetry, taught by a man who’s written not only poetry, but a novel, a memoir, and children’s books, and who won an American Book Award: Rigoberto Gonzalez? And right here, with these two selections, I see warm, dark earth for Dove’s seed of silence to germinate. The hermit crab essay resides on the lyric (vs. narrative) end of the essay continuum, and that end is rife with silences, the silences of poetry. And ekphrastic poems, which are inspired by other art forms, require a silence, staring long and long at a painting or photograph, let’s say, until its utterance moves the poet to give it voice on the page.
That seed of silence extends to the post-conference workshop called “Sensory String” at the Kachemak Bay Wilderness Lodge, led by Gonzalez. Here is the description:
“In this cross-genre generative workshop, participants will zero in on the natural textures of the environment to identity “seeds” that will grow into micro-prose or prose poems. Participants will gather their textures, sounds, smells, etc. from the local landscape, and then use each image to tease out a narrative or lyrical piece of writing. As strategies for growth, participants will employ such literary devices as synesthesia, language or sound poetry, and white space.”
There are at least 49 reasons to attend this year’s Kachemak Bay Writers’ Conference, and the theme of silence – the white space between utterances – is just one. The 18 teaching faculty provide 18 more. Check them out at:
http://writersconference.homer.alaska.edu/Bios/tinti.htm
The 100+ participants: well, that makes way more than 49 reasons.
Another reason is the unfolding story of each year’s gathering, the memories that stick. What memory will Rita Dove leave behind? Each keynote presenter imprints a mark on us, beyond a shaping idea, beyond the work itself. Russell Banks had his Hummer, sighted by locals roaring down dirt roads miles from town. After lunch one day, we meditated with Maxine Hong Kingston, and renamed ourselves. After the boat trip, Billy Collins achieved new artistic heights with his puffin haiku. Amy Tan brought her lap dogs (everywhere) and read wearing extra-tuffs. Li-Young Lee taught us Zen in the art of poetry.
In the end, it’s not so much a conference as a gathering: a temporary community made up of people in love with words, kind of like a literary Burning Man, but with just a tad less debauchery, a Burning Pen festival, not on the playa but on the bay. Which brings me to yet one more of 49 reasons to attend: Kachemak Bay itself, back-drop, shape-shifter, muse, flirt. Sometimes I imagine all of our previous keynote speakers still holed up in yurts over in Kachemak Bay State Park. Russell Banks left his Hummer in the Lands End parking lot for days after the conference while he disappeared into the woods across the bay.
And did I mention one of the top-ten reasons? Rita Dove. Here’s just a taste, the opening of her poem called “Flirtation,’ which, I’m told, is another one of the 49 reasons to attend (and also under “F,” friendships, old, renewed, and new):
After all, there’s no need
to say anything
at first. An orange, peeled
and quartered, flares
like a tulip on a wedgewood plate.
Anything can happen.
That sums it up for me. Come silent, come stuck, come lost to words, or overflowing. It begins in quiet, no need to say (or write) a word at first. And then some workshop, some poem or story read aloud, some conversation peels the layers back, and there it is, the reason you came: the flare. Bring extra pens. Bring a coffee cup. Plan to stay up late. Bring your dancing shoes. Anything, anything can happen.
The details: This year’s conference is from June10-14 at Land’s End Resort in Homer. For program schedule and other information, see the website: http://writersconference.homer.alaska.edu/index.htm
Early registration (at the lowest price) is until April 29.
Academic credit is available.
You can apply for need-based scholarships.
Eva Saulitis, author of the memoir Leaving Resurrection
Monday, April 18, 2011
LATE-BLOOMER, ARE YOU?: A Guest Post by Ken Waldman
I was properly chastised. Ever since, on mentioning my late-blooming life, I recall Sister Margaret.
I wrote my first short story in an undergraduate Creative Writing class. A Management Sciences major at Duke University, I took the elective as a junior year diversion. After graduation, during a period of cycling through a series of menial jobs in Boston, I took an eight-week fiction writing workshop. There, I wrote three stories, and started others.
In both settings, encouraged by classmates, more-or-less tolerated by workshop leaders, I began learning the craft. After my time in Boston, on a whim I applied to the MFA program at University of British Columbia, where I was wait-listed, then accepted at the last-minute. This was thirty years ago, a more innocent time technologically. I didn't have a telephone answering machine and didn't get the acceptance letter for two weeks. By then the spot had been filled.
Five years later, 29 years old, after a move to Seattle, I wrote my next story. That one was a struggle and despite the satisfaction in finishing, I knew the story lacked something essential. But what, I couldn't tell. Maybe in another five years, I thought, I'd write another; maybe I never would.
Three months later, in the midst of personal tumult, I started a new story and completed it quickly. Something had shifted. I'd found my voice, or, more accurately, had happened onto it. Afterward, I understood that not only had this new piece, which was the best I'd ever written, come more naturally, but I knew I could duplicate the feeling and effect.
Over the next months, I applied to the MFA program at University of Alaska Fairbanks, was accepted, and moved to the Alaska Interior. During my three years there, I wrote plenty more stories, started scribbling poems, composed critical papers and short essays, taught composition and creative writing classes, and day-by-day went about building the foundation of a life where writing, in some form, had a daily, central place.
Just like there are good and bad days, some seasons have been easier, some tougher. Sometimes the focus has been on generating. Sometimes on editing. Sometimes on publishing and marketing. Even when everything has gone well, I've had my distractions (for instance, over the years, I've learned it's virtually impossible for me to do anything while on tour but be on tour). But since composing that story in 1985, the one that felt that, yes, now I'm a writer, every major decision I've made has been to support some aspect of my writing.
Late-bloomer? In 1989, when I was 33 and had just finished my MFA, I had my first stories and poems accepted in literary journals. In 2000, when I was 44, I had my first full-length poetry collection published. The past ten years I've been fortunate to have had a variety of small presses bring out five more full-length poetry collections, a memoir, and a children's book. With eight books now, nine CDs, and a busy touring schedule, I've invented a full-time writer's life for myself, even if it's unorthodox by most standards, and a little late in the game. At least my work is out in the world, available to anyone interested.
Of course, that's not enough. It never is. There's always the next project, and with it the next round of challenges. The books and CDs are gratifying, but what am I to do with the unpublished novel, story collection, memoir, and four poetry collections? And amidst days that are already full, how do I find time to sit down and write the new books, ones that in some cases I've been thinking about for years?
Here, I recall five lessons. They helped late-blooming me before; they may well help me again. And maybe they'll help you, whether late-bloomer, or not.
1) In the late 80's and early 90's, I read all the University of Michigan Press Poets on Poetry series. In the volume by Robert Bly, Talking All Morning, he advised that if you want to learn to write, don't take a writing class, but, rather, apprentice under a master in a field you're passionate about. According to Bly, as an apprentice, you'll learn what it takes to become truly expert, and from there it's a relatively easy process to adapt those kinds of skills to writing. Bly went on to explain that the biggest benefit in working this way is that when you do turn to writing, you have fresh stories from the field in which you apprenticed, as well as an authentic vocabulary from that field.
Twenty years later, I still recall this. In fact, expanding Bly's point, I'll say that since life experience is cumulative, ANY experience is fair game for the writer, and the more mature the writer, the wider the range of experience. Doctor, lawyer, farmer, chef: the world is full of stories. There are stories, as well, for any long-time husband or wife, or any long-time single man or woman. Special vocabularies, too.
And writers CAN benefit from writing classes; they need only pay extra-close attention.
2) In graduate school I got in the habit of reading interviews with writers. Who isn't curious how the most successful ones practice their craft? There are surely lessons in hearing that diametrically opposed strategies can work. One writer might carefully outline a project before starting; another might avoid an outline of any kind, feeling a loss of spontaneity ruins enthusiasm.
There's never one absolute answer, only the answer that's correct for you. So, while reading interviews can be inspirational, they're a means to the end. Afterward, make time to sit down (or lie down, stand up, stand on your head) and write. Write in bed, at a coffee shop, with a friend, on a retreat. Try everything. Eventually
you'll know what works best for you.
3) Alas, as much as you'd like to, you can't do everything. Maybe you have a family that will always come first. Fine. But if your day job always comes second, friends always third, a clean house fourth, and on and on--and the list is always endless--then the question becomes where, realistically, does writing fit. New poems, short stories, essays, and articles are intrinsically a time-consuming, messy business. Beginning a novel is a major undertaking. Completing one will take months, more likely years. If there are other priorities, fine. There's never a single way.
But if you want to write, sometime you have to be selfish and make time, which might well mean examining how you're spending days, and then negotiating (with yourself, and others) how to find necessary hours. That might well mean putting in motion a process that will change your life in fundamental ways.
Recently, starting a memoir, I spent Christmas week writing instead of visiting my partner's family, three thousand miles away. Not everyone is in position to sidestep those kinds of obligations. But I was. Thanks to the momentum from that week, I finished a first draft within two months.
4) A tip about sharing. In workshops, writers will sometimes share copies with other participants, who read the work at home and write comments. At the next session, after a discussion, those take-home copies are handed back to the original writer.
While it helps to have readers who offer advice, what do you do with all those comments? Listen to everybody? It's the old cliché of cooks and broth. A friend once told me that if you were fortunate in a setting like that, you'll find one reader making one comment that truly resonates. That's the suggestion that points to a key edit that otherwise may have taken weeks, or months, to discover.
While a writer can't--and shouldn't--take every bit of offered advice, a writer does have to be open to changes. By cultivating a trusted reader or two who makes thoughtful, smart suggestions, you've found more than a friend. Treat these readers accordingly.
5) Back to the University of Michigan Press Poets on Poetry series, and a book of essays by William Stafford, Writing the Australian Crawl. While I was never fortunate to have a real-life mentor, I met Stafford through his poetry and prose, which always managed to inspire. He made it seem simple: if he could do it, so could I. This book of essays explains his writing process. When he says, “lower your standards,” he doesn't mean to write badly, but to allow yourself to write imperfectly. Stafford woke early, wrote daily, prolifically. He seemingly never got stuck, because he accepted whatever came to him. A late-bloomer, his first book of
poetry was published when he was 46. My take on his philosophy of writing: The more we write, the luckier we get--so what are we all waiting for. Instead of reading about writing, or talking about writing, let's get back at it.
Friday, April 15, 2011
Ela: 49 Writers Weekly Round-up
.



